How do you identify budget differences? (2024)

Identifying budget differences involves comparing and analyzing financial data to determine variations between planned or expected budgets and actual spending or income. This process is crucial for financial management, decision-making, and course correction. Remember that budget differences are a natural part of financial management. The key is to use the insights gained from analyzing these differences to make informed decisions and improve the organization's financial performance over time.

As a Finance Lead, navigating budget differences is more than comparing numbers; it's about interpretating the financial narrative. Favorable or unfavorable, these variances are key indicators of operational efficiency and financial health. The fascinating aspect lies in their contextual interpretation, varying for different stakeholders. Proactively addressing budget differences requires transparent communication, regular reviews, and dynamic response strategies. In essence, these variances tell a story of a company's financial resilience, strategic effectiveness, and the collective efforts of its team."

(edited)

Understanding why the variance has arisen is vital and more imporantly what action needs to be taken as a result. Variance should not be looked at in isolation. As stated there are many reasons including: poor budgeting, changing circ*mstances, client changes, poor operational performance or delivery, delays and inaccurate pricing/quotations. It is vital to understand these and more importantly the impact and what action needs to be taken going forward.

Once pricing is recieved on a project, is important to categorize what areas of the budget changed beyond an acceptable norm to gain knowledge on what categories have been budgeted poorly due to assumptions or quickly changing price structures, so future project budgets can be more accurate. Similarly, if there are categories that are continually over budgeted, knowing you may be able to reduce those categories in the future can make your company more competitive for future work or projects.

In the world of Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A), budget differences pack a punch. They trigger changes in how we do things, from strategies to where we spend money. These differences also help us get better at predicting the future and talking with people who care about our organization. By dealing with budget differences, we’re like financial superheroes, using data to make things work out well…

Big Budget lines differences (budget vs actuals) may show either inaccurate budgeting or change in priorities of the Organization. A regular revision may lead to adjustments in budget lines to avoid major disruptions in the operation.

It’s important to put the story at first place itself before talking about numbers. Story should include overall impact on all elements of PL and CF. This avoids repeating same reasons again in multiple lines. Any remedial action can also be included in the story itself. This would give the positive start of budget meeting.

The best way to analyze budget differences is by properly defining your assumptions when developing your budget. Your variance must be analyzed in individual pieces (via KPIs), comparing the actuals of your assumptions against your original assumptions. Once the budget is set, you must continue to report on the KPIs against budget. For example, if you assumed a certain DSO while budgeting for cash, you must understand what your current DSO is to identify if its overall sales deviations that are driving the variance (market conditions, etc), or potentially a drop in collection speed (could be an internal process failure). Comparing actual KPIs vs assumptions will allow you to further refine where your variance is stemming from.

Understanding budget differences is a fundamental step in comprehending deviations and responding effectively. To analyse these differences, compare actual and budgeted amounts, calculate variances and percentages, and identify whether they are favourable or unfavourable. Categorize the variances as volume or price-related, investigate their causes and impacts using relevant data, and communicate the findings and recommendations clearly to stakeholders through concise reports and charts.

Drawing from my own experience, I've found that using standardized formats like budget variance reports is not just about numbers but about telling a story. For instance, when presenting to our management team, incorporating visual aids like graphs or waterfalls helped convey complex information clearly. Personalizing the message for different audiences, such as tailoring recommendations for specific teams, has proven effective in driving understanding and action. These anecdotes emphasize that reporting budget differences isn't just a routine task but an opportunity to engage and inform stakeholders with real-world insights.

Variances should be reviewed (as a minimum) every month when analysing and reviewing the monthly management accounts. It is importnat to understand why the variance has arisen and what it means in terms of performance, cash flow and future funding.

Also, providing disclosures and brief notes on anomalies, large variances, and/or upcoming changes can help stakeholders decipher what's going on with the business and what decision(s) if any are necessary.

I'd like to add one more key word - engagement, budgeting is not a finance-only game, so try to engage all the stakeholders as much as possible, from budget setting to comparing the budget differences, all the way along. And there are lots of ways for engagement, inviting relevant department into the budget setting/review/analysis courses, if not feasible, learn these departments' KPIs and try to understand how they operate and what are the financial indication, ask "silly" questions, Finance BPs should have "super power" within the organization, who knows each part of the business, at least financially.ENGAGEMENT, is very important.

I would add the support required to achieve forecast and potential upside where team is working on. This builds transparency among the reviewers and shows agility of team.

There could be two causes for the discrepancy between budgeted and actual numbers.1)Your budgeted figures are sound, but trends are changing.2)Your calculations have no foundation, which causes a discrepancy.It is a thorough analysis and to check the accuracy of budget at the following levels:1)The Budget AC Heads and Sub AC Heads should match the Trial Balance's Expense Category; otherwise, human computations may result in inaccuracies2)Your Budgeting should be on real terms not carrying baseless assumption values.3)Without a base calculation for each input and outflow value of budget, your identification process will produce no results