New Insurance Product For Lay Executors - Insurance Laws and Products - Canada (2024)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Earlier this year, a new insurance product, ERAssure waslaunched and is now available in BC. While errors and omissionsinsurance has long been available for directors and officers,professionals and even strata council members, this is the firsttime that such a product has become available in Canada forexecutors and trustees. Similar products are available in theUnited States, United Kingdom and Australia.

The ERAssure product provides coverage to individual (but notcorporate) executors, trustees and administrators for damagesarising out of errors and omissions committed during theadministration of an estate. Defence costs are also covered underthe policy.

Under the policy, the insurer agrees to pay all sums which theinsured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages arising out ofa claim, if the liability is the result of an error, omission ornegligent act in the performance of, or failure to perform, theduties of estate trustee. Like any insurance policy, there aredefinitions, conditions and exclusions which may limit coverage.For example, one of the requirements is that the policy must bepurchased within 60 days of the testator's death. Thisrequirement ensures that executors move to obtain coverage beforesignificant estate decisions are made. There is an initial launchprovision that allows coverage on existing estates, providedcertain requirements are met.

The policy can be written on virtually any size of estate withthe liability capped at three million dollars. With additionalunderwriting, it is possible to offer a liability limit as high asfive million dollars.

One of the most important conditions to note is that the policyis "claims-made", as opposed to "occurrence"based, meaning that coverage is conditional upon the claim beingmade against the insured for the first time during the policyperiod, regardless of when the alleged error, omission or negligentact took place (subject to a number of further conditions). Promptreporting of the claim is therefore absolutely necessary in orderfor coverage to be confirmed.

While the ERAssure product (as with any insurance product) doesnot cover all claims that an executor or trustee might face,individual executors and trustees should be made aware of itsavailability. Given how costly litigation can be, it could provideprotection for the appropriate estate administration.

Note that the policy does not require a trial to triggercoverage. A claim made for monetary damages is sufficient. This isimportant because not every dispute over estate administrationbecomes the subject of a lawsuit. In our experience, the number oflawsuits actually filed against executors and the number of thosethat proceed to trial seems relatively small in relation to all ofthe potential litigation. There may be a number of explanations forthis:

  • The cost of carrying legal proceedings through to trial is veryhigh.
  • The accepted level of ability and diligence for a lay executoris not a standard of perfection. While the courts emphasize thehigh fiduciary duties required of an executor, clients aresometimes surprised at the reluctance of the court to remove anexecutor for mere delays or poor communication. Lawyers, therefore,are typically reluctant to embroil their clients in protractedlitigation except as a last resort.
  • Frequently the dissatisfaction of beneficiaries is played outin the course of determining an executor's compensation. It isoften in this final part of an estate administration thatbeneficiaries raise negligence, delays or poor investment decisionmaking and seek to hold the executor's compensation to thelowest possible level, rather than commencing negligence basedlegal action. While executor compensation may be challenged incourt, frequently this takes place in shorter duration hearings andcan often be resolved before the actual hearing date.
  • Despite the restraints on estate administration litigationdiscussed above, there are signs that the landscape may bechanging. First, with the dramatic increase in real estate valuesover the last 10 years, estates are proportionately larger than inprevious decades, making litigation appear worth the costs. Second,the ramifications of a high divorce rate are also beginning toreverberate significantly; second marriages have potential toresult in discord after death and are increasingly reflected inestate disputes.

Additionally, it has been suggested by some observers that thelitigious culture of the United States may be creeping northward.Related to this is the reality of the internet which may also havean impact on increased litigation. Not only does it make thebeneficiary an "expert" on all topics, the fact that anexecutor also has more ready access to information might well raisethe standard of acceptable performance over time. Some lawyers arebeginning to hear that the defence of "how should I haveknown" is being responded with "how could you nothave known".

While it is difficult to anticipate all of the impacts of thisnew type of coverage, we expect that the practical resolutionprocess will not change significantly from the current practice.The change, however, will be in who bears the cost related toallegations of executor negligence. With an insurance policy inforce, the defence and an indemnity is paid for by the insurancecompany and not from estate assets or the executor personally. Thiscould be quite important when a file starts to "get out ofcontrol" and costs begin to escalate quickly. It will be theinsurer who has the liability and not the executor.

While the issue has not yet been determined by the Courts, it ispossible that the insurance premiums would be payable from theestate. We expect that this issue will depend on whether the Courtwill view this type of insurance as a necessary expense of theexecutor. Of course, it is also possible for a testator to provide,in his or her will, that the costs of insurance be borne by theestate.

In estates, there has often been this perceived unfairness thata lay executor must assume various burdens without the benefit ofinsurance coverage such as has been made available to institutionalexecutors either through their own self-insurance or otherpolicies. We expect the availability and use of this coverage willreduce some of the stresses that otherwise engage an estatefile.

ERAssure is only available at the recommendation of legalcounsel. If you or your client is an executor and interested inthis product, members of our Wealth Preservation group are able toassist.

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circ*mstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Insurance from Canada

Ontario Court Of Appeal Reverses Decision In Gagne v. Ivari: Implications For Insurer Oversight And Consumer Protection

Dentons

On February 2, 2024, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in the case Gagne v. Ivari[1]. The decision overturned a motion judge's ruling...

An Insurer Ordered To Pay Damages – The Court Of Appeal Intervenes

Lavery

On February 12, 2024, the Court of Appeal of Quebec handed down its decision in Société d'assurance Beneva inc. c. Bordeleau, dealing in particular...

Ontario Court Addresses Important, Recurring Issues In Complex Liability Coverage Disputes

Field LLP

The Court of Appeal (i) affirmed time-on-risk as the correct method for allocating the costs of defence between insurers when claims span many years, (ii) affirmed that insurers are not obligated...

No Choice But To Share: Ontario Court Of Appeal Rules On Defence Costs Allocation For Long-tail Claims, Other Coverage Issues

Fillmore Riley

By virtue of its lengthy decision in Loblaw Companies Limited v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, the Ontario Court of Appeal has weighed in on, among other things

Nova Scotia Court Of Appeal Orders Interest Payable Under Disability Policy Based On Required Medical Evidence Submitted

Theall Group LLP

In Peters v Great-West Life Assurance Company, 2024 NSCA 21, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal (NSCA) held against the insured on an application brought to settle the pre-judgment interest...

Lenczner Slaght LLP

In Canada, numerous class proceedings have launched on behalf of governments and individuals against entities involved in the manufacture...

New Insurance Product For Lay Executors - Insurance Laws and Products - Canada (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Eusebia Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5504

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Eusebia Nader

Birthday: 1994-11-11

Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

Phone: +2316203969400

Job: International Farming Consultant

Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.